Funding Models For Networking   

In addition to maintaining current networking services, there is a need to provide enhanced services in the form of additional hookups and in the form of additional robustness for current connections. The present model for funding these networking services is inadequate.

Both the CITSADMN and the CITSAC standing committees prepared reports on possible funding models to support networking services. These were sent to a subcommittee on Funding Models which has presented three models for consideration. These models are presented in the January 26, 1995, report, "Funding Models for Network '99 Core Network Operations," which can be found in Appendix 4.

The three funding models, explained more fully in the report, are summarized as follows:

1. Base funding from a variety of sources. Enhancements from end-of-year funds if available.

2. Annual budget for core operations. Major adjustments to the core network come from a separate budget and/or from those who require the adjustments.

3. Enhanced services to be paid for by the recipients of those services.

Model one basically describes the current funding model which is tied to end-of-year surplusses. It will not provide the resources necessary to meet future needs.

Recommendation FM1: The University needs to utilize a funding model which provides an annual budget for core operations, a separate budget for required adjustments to the core service, and which will charge recipients for enhanced services.


Website designed by Erica Fickett.
©2000 University of Florida, all rights reserved.     Last updated on Wednesday, March 28, 2001.